Monday, May 25, 2015

3 Eras of Education.

When people talk about school, they might be talking about completely different things. Let me explain.

School is a societal cultural incubator. 

The children of most countries spend 5 days there from approximately ages 5-18. They are presented with information and perspectives from a curriculum that has been selected by the government's education department. Values that are deemed worthy from the country are focused on and fostered in kids and at the end of it all, we essentially say you have developed the way we wanted in the incubator and you are ready to be part of the adult portion of our society to contribute with your skills. (but you will likely want some refinement first in your particular area of interest in higher education first)

There are incredible upsides and horendous downsides to using school as our cultural incubator.
Before addressing those, let's look at the story of schooling. To give it a narrative I will look through three lenses:

- conformity
- achievement
- differentiation

Each of these represents a historical era of schooling, complete with its own set of practices, values and ideals to create citizens for the kind of society it wanted.

Era 1 - Conformity (early 1800s - to present day)

Modern public schooling emerged from Prussia in the early 1800s. Prussia wanted a better military.

They felt that waiting until soldiers were 12 to begin training was a waste of valuable time. What if they could start modeling the kinds of soldiers they wanted at an earlier age?

They started taking 5 year olds and teaching them basic Language, Math and Science skills that would make them more effective soldiers when doing service in the military.

After just a few years of this experiment, it was evident that Prussia was developing an incredibly effective army. So other governments around the world started to invest in Public Schooling. Government funded, state run educational institutions for (almost) all citizens.
I am aware that I am making huge generalizations here to capture the school experience across dozens of countries, but here is what this basic Era of Conformity Education focused on:

Core Value for the Society:

- respect and obedience towards authority (images of Kings, Queens, local military leaders on the walls)

Role of the Teacher:

- source of authority and punishment (otherwise punishment was in order, including physical violence against a disobedient student)

Activities most commonly focused on:

- memorization and recitation (all of the good thinking has already been done by people wiser than you, it is your job to make their ideas your own, by reciting poems, stories, text from great speeches, religious texts etc)

Student's role:

- your only real job is to not get out of line and learn to do what you are told

School Environment to aid this:

- students were rarely organized by year, but rather a teacher would instruct students from ages 5 through 13 in the same room. Typically individual desks in rows facing the front of the room.

What kind of soeciety was present at the time? One centered around military service and the growing industrial revolution.

What kind of people do you need to have a successful military and early industrial workforce (based on long days, repetitive tasks with machine like work)? Obedient people, who won't go off doing their own thing and messing with what the larger system requires of them.

Fun Fact: I have done some research on what report cards looked like from this era. The only kind of formal report commonly given by teachers about students provided information only on attendance, cleanliness, number of behaviour incidents and sometimes the numbers of lines memorized of a religious text. Just showing up, participating and not causing a fuss and staying tidy was all that was demanded of students.

Era 2 - Achievement (late 1800s to present day)

Around the late 1800s, this model of schooling started to change due to the changing needs of the society. The industrial revolution brought with it a more free market economy and the pursuit of individual success was going to be what drove its success. We no longer just need obedient members of society.

We still need folks who will play by the rules, but they must be motivated to achieve success if our society will work.

By the 1890s schools started to take their curriculums and assign marks, based on the percentage of mastery that students could demonstrate.

All of a suddent you weren't just in the same cohort with others, you were attempting to achieve success for yourself against the government's selected topics.

All of a sudden students weren't ranked by cleanliness and lack of disruptions, rather based on how well they could do in relation to their peers.

Characteristics of this type of schooling involve:

Core Value for the Society:

- individual achievement, figuring how to strategically get ahead within the system, setting goals and accomplishing them.

Role of the Teacher:

- to share information so that students can be tested against what was presented.

Activities most commonly focused on:

- curriculum broken down into compartmentalized units for easy assessment
- celebrating specific cognitive skills over other competencies
- experimentation to reveal previously known conclusions to verify their validity
-  your ideas and opinions about topics discussed are taken into consideration (class discussions, debates, presenting perspectives in an essay etc.)

Student's role:

- getting good marks, passing class, not failing.

School Environment to aid this:

- majority of tasks are done independently to ensure proper assessment of the individual (group work is usually used more for tasks that won't be marked)
- seating arrangement may vary, the classroom in primary typically has centers or specific areas where certain jobs or activities are worked on, like a work place.

By and large we don't think of this as an era of education, we think of it as school itself.
While conformity and obedience are still very much required, they are more indirect than in the previous era.

Era 3 - Differentiation (approx the 1980s, but evidence since 1930s- present day)

This era really started to show up in Canada and Europe in the early 1990s and has been bumping up against Achievement education and is still taking root. The overall ideas though have been spreading into schools all across the world.

Eventually it was hard to ignore that the achievement era marginalized a large percent of those in the system. It created a bell curve with some who found school too difficult and either dropped out or barely got through it, while others grew bored of the easy tasks. Just like a one size fits all T-Shirt, it will work for a few, but the shirt itself fails being a great shirt.

A one size fits all curriculum to measure students against simply doesn't work for all involved. So some educational systems started differentiating tasks, curriculum and expectations so that it met the needs of the student. Authority figures in both the Conformity and Achievement eras presented the curriculum that students had to live up to. Now, the needs and abilities of students have finally come online.

What has started to change in society that required us to start moving away from the achievement era?

This is a cartoonishly simplistic summary, but basically, it used to be the case that if you did well in school, you either got into a higher end of jobs than those who didn't, or you had access to higher level post secondary schools which opened even more opportunities for you. This world still exists to a small degree, but is not the reality for most. Students leaving schools in the Western World in 2015 are entering an extremely different economy and work force than someone entering the work force in 1965.

So what kinds of things are going on in our social cultural incubator now?
Some characteristics of this differentiated era include:

Core Value for the Society:

Consensus, shared understanding, sensitivity, post modern thinking, deconstructionism.

Role of the Teacher:

- attention by teachers and staff on not marginalizing a student based on ability
- all perspectives are welcome. No ideas or positions should be marginalized.

Activities most commonly focused on:

-  less focus on content and more on critical skills
- group consensus intended to develop ideas through exploration, shared discussion and drawing one's own conclusions (think modern Math problem solving/presenting techniques Bansho etc)
- differentiated tasks with a lot more group and partner work

Role of the student:

To share understanding of topics with others, present their thinking and yet see other's perspectives. Be prepared to be tested at their level of development. 

School Environment to aid this:

- Individualized Education Plans so that student abilities are taken into account and the curriculum is edited so that the challenge meets their needs
- Multiple Intelligences start to be take into consideration as it is obvious their are more than just cognitive ways to be successful
- students interests in relation to the curriculum are take into account through more inquiry based approaches to ideas that must be studied

This differentiated era represents the fact that the world no longer instantly supports those who managed to achieve well in school and takes into consideration that in our post modern, globally connected world there is no one position or perspective that is universally applicable anymore.

I simply wanted to present these 3 eras to you as a framework for almost all of my future blog posts.
Soon I will attempt to:

- highlight conflicts about the future of education in terms of Achievement and Differentiated Eras coming into conflict
- highlight the developmentally advantageous and oppressive drawbacks of each approach
- explain what I think the 4th era of education will look like that is just starting to pop up now, which I am dubbing Integral.

Saturday, May 9, 2015

1 word to use with kids to become an enlightened problem solving wizard

During my first few years teaching I kind of sucked at helping kids sort out problems on the playground or in the class. 

- I am not a parent.
- I don't spend much time around kids in my personal life.
- I am a peacemaker (text book type 9 in the enneagram personality test) and tend to avoid a lot of conflict in my own life.

I lack real life experience rationalizing with minds that can't handle syllogistic logic. 

I took a PD course through Drake University a few years back with Bill Pike that gave me one word that changed everything.

Choosing

Example time.

A few kids on the playground are arguing and one aggressively pushes the other. You swoop in as teachers do in this situation before it escalates.

Typical sentence stems for firing up a convo with the kid might be:

-  What do you think you are doing...
-  I just saw you....
-  (student name) What did do you think you are doing...
-  I don't believe what I just saw, you just pushed so and so
-  I don't like what I just saw...
- What did you just do to him?

Behind all of these sentences that we naturally defer to is an intention to ensure that we are protecting the kids involved (whole other issue for another time about rough housing, but for now let's just leave it at the school rules are no pushing and the kids just broke the rules of the school).

My mechanical and magical approach in these situations is:

In a firm, but non-aggressive voice say:

I saw you (state the behaviour objectively), why are you choosing to do that?

Small semantic shift from:
Why did you do that?

But the addition of the word choosing is literally like bestowing upon your words some kind of magical spell that instantly plunges a kid into a psychological re-examination of their entire existence and relationship to mind, matter and action.

Ok... maybe not quite like that, but....

The focus then becomes about the kid sharing the actual cause beneath the behaviour and a genuine conversation can take place, rather than one about laying blame or shaming a kid for their behaviour.

I have actually seen the sentence completely shift the kid's behaviour and attention instantly. 




My experience shows that one of two things happens when a kid is presented with explaining why they "chose" what they did.

1.) The child starts blaming others or the situation.

In this case simply restate the question again until their answer contains a piece of ownership for their behaviour. This often then leads to the second thing that I see.

ie. I understand that they called you a name, but why did you choose to shove them?

2.) The child goes quiet and says "I don't know". 

In this case, stick with them and give them some time to ponder it. Just restate the question, again and focus on asking them why they chose to do what they did instead of something else.

I have had to wait up to 4 minutes before, but the answers kids have given me have been golden.

Often, kids are just used to getting the sharp voice, harsh word,  the look etc. which at best makes them stop the behaviour or symptom. Providing a kid a chance to reflect not only shows them that they are actually making decisions about their behaviour and attitude constantly, but also shows them that they can choose something more resourceful.

Sometimes they go quiet because no one has ever pointed out that they are choosing behaviours... they just do them and had never noticed they are in control.

MIND IS BLOWN



Kids have spilled the beans with me before going right to the core saying "I guess I am afriad that no one will like me, so I would rather hurt someone instead so I can feel strong".

Let's be honest, how many adults could reflect and honestly share that?

Allowing a kid to share this at 8 years old might save thousands in therapy down the road, or a string of real crap relationships for themselves and others.

When this kind of insight comes to a kid I let them know that what they are thinking is OK and we all do things for reasons that we might not always be proud of.  We then discuss next time what could be done differently and what would help them and others the most.

There may still be a consequence required based on school rules, but at least the kiddo makes the connection between behaviour, choice, rules and consequences. 

Takes time and presence, but investing time now in kids seems more than worth it down the road if they can be more aware of the choices they make and the reasons behind them.

Just know that the kids you teach will likely hear the word choice and choose about a billion times during the year.

Wednesday, May 6, 2015

Identifying States. Not on a map. But in the kid's experience.

Behaviour management can suck up a ridiculous amount of time, attention and zest for life from a teacher. Especially if the teacher sees a student's behaviour as their job to control.

You may have seen some variation of the Red, Yellow and Green chart.

 Kid is having a typical day without disturbing the lesson their name on a clothes pin stays at green. Some kind of disruption and the teacher "puts them on yellow" as a warning, and then if they are "bad" again, they drop to Red and some kind of consequence is given.

I took this archaic approach and added Silver and Gold.

I also only allow the kids to move their names between the colours.

Oh... and we spent a considerable amount of time in class at the start of the year getting in touch with these various states and the students created strategies for how to shift their state from say Red to Yellow. ie. From a non-resourceful to more resourceful state.



We talked as a class about different ways we are at school and came up with these general categories to be associated with the colours.

Red. Worst kind of day possible at school.
Yellow. Ok. But a not so good day.
Green. Typically average good day.
Silver. Better than normal.
Gold. Best kind of day. On top of the world.

The kids came up with detailed descriptions of how they feel and what they might be doing in each state.









Now that the students can identify these states that they pass through, I rely on them to reflect and self assess where they are at. Students "check in" first thing in the morning and are welcome to change their spot throughout the day when they notice a shift. 

The morning bit helps. If a kid is boiling inside from a fight with their parents or issue with a friend, it is nice to know they feel out of control instead of me waiting for an example of it. 

I can also address and check in with them in class about their state if a "behaviour" issue arises and verify if they were accurately identifying where they were at.

ie. (actual typical exchange in my room)

Me: Timmy, I saw you just toss Sally's book on the floor and you haven't appeared very focused on your work. What's up? What colour of behaviour is that? 

Timmy: Yeah, that was kind of Red. I just wasn't really thinking. 

Me: You had your name on Green. That does not appear like Green behaviour to me. 

Timmy: Yeah, I feel I am actually almost Yellow.

Me: So what are you going to do to shift up to Yellow?


This is where students choose a strategy from the lists they generated for tips to get from Red to Yellow, Yellow to Green, Green to Silver and Silver to Gold. 





This gives us opportunities throughout the day to discuss the choice we can have in influencing our states. It also puts the behaviour management onto the student. It is then only my job to step in and be a student's "boss" when they are unable to be their own.

I even demonstrate humility by letting the kids know when I am in a Yellow to Red state and share how I might be struggling to demonstrate self-regulation.

The kids get it and this seems to help us manage some fairly emotionally articulate discussions...
oh yeah... and makes my life in the class a billions times easier because I am not attempting to micromanage the inner world of a 9 year old through control and discipline.